I will never (2025 present time) intentionally claim allegiance to any political, religious, philosophical, or any other group. I may draw inspiration, but in general I do not view any "-ism" or group that I know of in existence, as worthwhile allegiance. If I ever do so, I will make an effort to make a statement here.
I do not currently offer any services or products, nor do I comment or communicate in any online forums of any kind since a few years. I will not contact anyone, especially online, offering services or products of any kind outside of normal, regular jobs where you meet in person in public before any kind of payment takes place. If anyone does that on my behalf or claiming to be me, it is not me and it may be a scammer.
Moral Background - Aspirations
# All moral laws could be summarized into one: Strive To Do No Harm (To God's intended Creations - Truth)
# Anyone only owns that which they can predictably defend and maintain.
# Owning goes both ways and should be sought. Ownership and any other "-ship" may be a blessing or a curse, a "ship" being a vessel driven in large part by mysterious forces. "Ships" cannot and ought not be sought contractually (contracts are not narratives nor unpredictable in nature), though possibly as a means of faith.
# Out of Context and Condition, it's almost always preferable to opt for the latter.
# Never mix Work and Family/Passions/Pleasure as it is inherently deleterious to both. (Unless noone involved cares if one is destroyed).
# If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.
# Unless you are a kind of trainee, don't expect to follow guidance, follow Truth & Instinct.
# The worst things that could happen is permanent physical damage or perpetual maladaptation
# Condemnation does not belong on Earth between earthly beings.
# Disclaiming is more often relevant than claiming/Committing. Truth is apophatic.
# Many things may be too late, but it is never too late to heal.
# Eco-no-my is an eco-system which is not mine. Humans are stewards (of Earth / Nature in some format).
# What a word, term or name consists of, inevitably eventually reflects what it does
# What is not seen or known, is still felt (presumeably somewhere subconsciously between mind and instinct, utterly lost. Doubtless, utterly miserable.)
# Without reality-testing, all is theory or confusion.
# Help is for the dead or for the desperate. Support is for the living.
# Lending resources, one question seems relevant: "How will this sustain needing less from the outside in the future ?" (outsourcing)
# Often, it should be profitable to attempt to ask/discern "What would the world inevitably move towards if everyone did what "I"/"they" just did/do in general ?" (The definition of "what was done" being malleable contextually, but nonetheless observable.). Based upon undeniable built-in dynamics/inclinations of biological/spiritual entities & environments. (Regardless of intent or even moral theory behind behaviors/actions, solely attempting to observe dynamics however they might appear and however opposed they might be, etc. Of course, I do think noone but God could measure someones life altogether in any meaningful way, but as humans I do believe that we are able to discern separate dynamics in a larger context.)
# All human conditions require TRUTH (information/wisdom/commonality), USEFULNESS(agentic/benevolent) and consent/CONTRACTual reliance (assurance such that reassurance/unpredictable dependence may be unnecessary) - None are dispenseable, yet the two former are most difficult to account for as they are easily subject to (contextual) reframing, while the latter (contractual) inherently attempts to stay factual.(That is not to say that all contracting is moral or good or wholesome/full-scope, merely that no evil can flourish without the lack of some form of affirmative contract, ultimately.)(Truth being an ultimate value, but corruptible to earthly preexisting conditions. Of course Truth cannot be contracted, it simply exists. Nor do I consider contracts to be higher than Truth. However I do conclude, that without basic trust or agreeable terms there can be no accountability or progress towards Truth. Generally, the fewer and simpler agreements/"contracts", the lesser responsibility, risk of failure despite evidence of intent, and the higher the potential of existing agreements/"contracts". The only exception that i can notice, being unavoidable parent-child dynamics such as Parent/child - state/population - human/animal - healthy/impaired dynamics where one party cannot necessarily hope to possess the necessary vocabulary, even with affirmative definitions going into any agreement/"contract". Right is right and wrong is wrong - those "contracts" are of course hopefully dictated by nature and common trust-based values so far as possible in terms of consistent physical and mental resource - nothing more or less than that.)
(OTHER TOPIC) Without common vocabulary/background, reality-testing or (contextual) positive relevance, information is nothing more than info-tainment. (I may struggle to contend with extreme forms of seeming manifest wastefulness/confusion/surreality. Regardless.)